I have two questions for you.  

First, have you ever been in the ballot box on voting day and not voted for the candidate you really wanted because you were worried that the candidate you really didn’t want was going to win?  I know I have.  This is called “strategic voting” to prevent the “spoiler effect” and it diminishes the representativeness and freedom of our democracy.  

Second, have you ever wondered why so many elections have winners who don’t get 50%?  For instance, there have been 19 elections for president that saw the winner get less than half of the votes in the country.  It also happens in congressional elections every two years.  I don’t know about you but it sure seems strange to me to have the people in power supported by fewer than half of the population.  

Luckily, there’s a way to fix both of these problems at the same time: Ranked-Choice Voting (RCV). RCV is just a slight change to the way we vote, but it guarantees that winners get more than 50% of the vote every time and that you get to vote for your favorite candidate without fear of “spoiling” the candidate you think most likely to win.  

But how does it work?

RCV is easy - really easy.  All you have to do is rank your favorite candidates from most favorite to least favorite and you’re good to go.  It’s like when you’re going to the store to get ice cream and your wife/husband/partner/friend says,

“I want cookie dough,” and you say, “Sure thing, what if they’re out of cookie dough, though?” 

They say, “Then I’ll have mint chocolate chip.” 

That’s it - they just RCVed their ice cream order.  We do this every day, with almost every choice we make.  Why should politics be any different?

“But how does it guarantee 50%?” you ask. “How does it let me vote for my favorite?”  RCV has a feature that normal voting doesn’t.  To see this feature, picture this four candidate race:

We have four candidates, Red, Pink, Blue, and Lilac.  Let’s pretend that Red and Pink have similar policies and Blue and Lilac have similar policies.  After everyone ranks their votes, Blue is in the lead with 35%, followed by Red at 30%, then Pink at 25%, then Lilac at 10%.  Because no one has more than 50%, the instant runoff function kicks in.  The last-place candidate, Lilac, is eliminated, and everyone who voted for Lilac has their votes shifted to their second favorite - let’s say they all liked Blue second best. 

Now we have Blue at 45%, Red at 30%, and Pink at 25%, but still no majority.  So the runoff happens again!  This time Pink is eliminated and the Pink voters are moved to their second choice - let’s say they all liked Red best. 

Now we have Red in first place at 55% and Blue in second at 45%!  Just like that, the true voice of the voters won out.  Even though it looked like Blue was ahead at round one (and Blue would have won under our current system), more voters preferred Red to Blue, so it makes sense that Red won in the end.

All the voters had to do was vote their conscience, and the system did the rest.  RCV - as easy as 1, 2, 3.

Spencer Reynolds

About

I joined Forward Party in 2021 as the Digital Director and Director of Political Partnerships and I couldn't be more excited to build a better future with you all.